Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Computer technology has made information available at a click of a button. This phenomenon has led certain people to believe that maintaining public libraries is waste of valuable resources, as libraries have been replaced by online websites and discussion forums. Though, I do not agree with their view.
Students are greatly benefited by the relevant and detailed information available at their disposal. With the help of computers and digital books they no longer need to check in the library if the book is available and if not, what is the waiting period. Use of computers and internet saves precious time for them. As the prime reason for libraries is no longer relevant in today’s age. It is correct on the part of certain people to say maintaining of public libraries is waste of money.
Whereas, information available on internet is not always accurate. As more and more individuals have access to sharing information, it has been observed that much of it is incorrect and without any proof to support. Moreover, computers and websites sharing information are always at the risk of a virus attack, which can wipe out all the data within a fraction of a second. In addition, older people are not tech savy and rely on physical copies of books to read. Hence, it will be extremly inconveinent for them to access information. Therefore, maintenance and updation of public libraries is essential as it can serve as a vital tool of information at any given time.
In my opinion, computers and internet are a valuable resource as it saves time and provides convenience. But maintaining public library is necessary as internet information at times can be incorrect and unavailable, unlike libraries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-15 | karankhanolkar | 67 | view |
| 2018-04-15 | karankhanolkar | 61 | view |
- Fewer and fewer young people are choosing to become teachers Why do young people not want to be teachers How this could be changed 75
- Some People Think It Is Acceptable To Use Animals For The Benefit Of Humans. Other People Think It Is Wrong To Exploit Animals For Human Purposes. What Is Your Opinion? 73
- Science tells us the activites which are good for our health and which are bad. Millions of people all over the world know this and still do unhealthy acitvites. Why do think this is and what can be done to change this. 78
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 61
- More and more people are moving from rural areas to cities in search of a better life but city life has its own problems What are these problems Suggest some solutions 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... online websites and discussion forums. Though, I do not agree with their view. Stu...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... public libraries is waste of money. Whereas, information available on internet is n...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, whereas, in addition, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07067137809 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93502836263 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526501766784 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.718546143 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6875 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6875 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221686549395 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709013769351 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696124400945 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151071274994 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920720823335 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.