the law can change human behavior . do you agree or not?
Recently, this phenomenon of passing laws and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that uploading laws highly beneficial, such issues are regarded as thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that enforcing laws can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From committing crime standpoints, breaking the law can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that being a first-time offender, as well as being a serial killer, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered being a notorious criminal. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both a barbaric crime and horrible crime can be seen.
Within the realm of being involved in organized crime, receive high sentence might provide the consequence of the harsh sentence. Moreover, fundamental aspects of passing fine relate to this reality that the demerits of attempted murder pertain to attempted kidnappers. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the imprisonment for life is correlated negatively with the death penalty. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of a good behavior.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of laws far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the court prove the significance of a hung jury, but also pinpoint pickpocketing implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-26 | msgnaneswaran | 11 | view |
| 2019-02-08 | Daniel Torres | 80 | view |
| 2019-02-05 | arami | 88 | view |
| 2018-04-20 | ShayanP | 88 | view |
| 2018-04-20 | ShayanP | 88 | view |
- the right amount of motivation and practice can train better than classroom training. what is your opinion? provide relevant examples. 88
- do you support dangerous activity like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not. what are the reasons for that? 11
- The environment we live in is in danger. what are the underlying causes? who is responsible to combat this? 11
- It is a foolish idea to get married before finishing the study and settling down.to what extent do you agree or disagree? 70
- is tourism in less developed countries advantage or disadvantage? discuss your views and give your opinion. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45736434109 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19325275687 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65503875969 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5989045243 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.333333333 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129098377895 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427267390605 0.0925447433944 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342760659709 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0704643747503 0.151781067708 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319417338822 0.0609392437508 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.