With the development of science and technology, sophisticated medical equipment and modern treatments have been introduced and as a result, life expectancy of humans increased. There is a heated debate about positive and negative ramifications of this achievement. This essay will discuss how older people become an asset to the younger generation and elderly people depend on others for their livelihood.
With the increased life, elderly people are able to share their valuable experiences to the society. People learn many things from their activities throughout their lives. People share their knowledge from generation to generation and grandchildren get the opportunities to listen to stories even from their great grandparents. Hence, prolonged human life helps to create family bonds and a pleasant society.
On the other hand, elder generation is considered as a burden to the society. Majority of older people are feeble and are not physically and mentally fit enough for employments and their children or other organisations feed them. For instance, governments allocate significant amount of money for pension schemes and other welfare activities targeted at elders. Therefore, the workforce of the country have to bear the cost associated with the elder generation.
In summary, valuable knowledge can be shared from elderly people and expenses of senior citizens have to be borne by their guardians or governments. Since there are a number of disadvantages in prolonged life for society and individuals, in my opinion it is not a blessing to the society.
- Whether design of buildings will have a positive ornegative impact on people's life and work? 77
- Certain kinds of music promote learning in theirlife. Agree or disagree. 72
- Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease Pros amp Cons 86
- Medical technology can increase the humans life expectancy. Is it blessing or curse? 77
- In town and cities the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop Do you agree or disagree 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, therefore, for instance, in summary, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 5.94088669951 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50205761317 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02799013866 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58024691358 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8130957439 50.4703680194 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.846153846 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6923076923 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10417439951 0.242375264174 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399902922346 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548527814486 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0653875391526 0.151781067708 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385934454375 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.1260098522 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.