The environment we live in is in danger. what are the underlying causes? who is responsible to combat this?
Recently, the phenomenon of the environment and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that endangered environment highly beneficial, the issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that protection environment can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the climate change standpoint, the soil erosion can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the drought, as well as natural disorders, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered the melting icebergs. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both rising weather temperature and global warming can be seen.
Within the realm of solar radiation, sea-level rising might increase the consequences of the greenhouse effect. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the fossil fuel relate to this reality that the demerits of the carbon emission pertain to the ozone depletion. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the coastal flood is correlated negatively with contamination. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of noxious gases.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of preserving environment far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the pollutant particles prove the significance of the metropolis, but also pinpoints of traffic jam implications.
- for a successful company, selling products depends more on company's reputation or it depends more on if they provide discount and free offers.to what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- the environmental we live in is in danger.what are the underlying causes?who is responsible to combat this? 11
- can the internet replace the classroom teacher?discuss your views. 35
- if you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/ subject will you choose? 40
- The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn. Do you Agree or Disagree? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.688 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27300717995 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5495968317 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0681978374007 0.242375264174 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0222063055316 0.0925447433944 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293407423031 0.071462118173 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0384513803144 0.151781067708 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384396808483 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.2 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.