Recently, the phenomenon of cultural shock and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that new immigrants are highly beneficial, the issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that eradication cultural shock can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the immigration standpoint, the cultural sympathy can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that language learning, as well as mother tongue, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered 80 percent have problems with new culture. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both native and foreign can be seen.
Within the realm of foreign culture, the language barriers might increase the consequences of communication skills. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the cultural distance relate to this reality that the demerits of host culture pertain to indigenous people. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of newcomers is correlated negatively with a different environment. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of unpleasant feeling.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the native population far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of cultural sympathy prove the significance of a new lifestyle, but also pinpoints of the adjustment phase implications.
- Euthanasia is no longer acceptable in the modern society. discuss the solutions to accept this fact. 11
- if you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/ subject will you choose? 40
- successful spors stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters.do you support it or not? 85
- euthanasia is no longer acceptable in the modern society. discuss the solutions to accept this fact 11
- the environmental we live in is in danger.what are the underlying causes?who is responsible to combat this? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6746031746 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25008479065 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646825396825 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5972768654 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.166666667 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179566376082 0.242375264174 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548307361222 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547385089323 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101178379666 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674582010765 0.0609392437508 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.76 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.