large shopping malls are replacing small shops.
what is your opinion about this?
discuss with appropriate examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of the large shopping mall and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the small shop is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that shopping center can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the easier access standpoint, the global branch shop can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the ubiquity use of mall, as well as saving your time, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered economic prosperity. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both discount and free offer can be seen.
Within the realm of the lower price, the brand product might increase the consequences of convenience. Moreover, fundamental aspects of offer bonus relate to this reality that the demerits of the shop assistants help pertain to consultant assistant. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the variety of product is correlated negatively with assistance. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of productivity.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of competitive market mall far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of broadening your horizon prove the significance of global village, but also pinpoints of computer price tag implications.
- It is a foolish idea to get married before finishing the study and settling down to what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- do you think the consumer should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?give your views or any relevant example. 85
- polygamy has led to massive divorces rates around the globe.give the possible option for this issue and various solutions to reduce the rate. 11
- for a successful company, selling products depends more on company's reputation or it depends more on if they provide discount and free offers.to what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- mass media 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47859922179 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15782668456 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661478599222 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1614379073 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.333333333 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164005243186 0.242375264174 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472219975571 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04426792975 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0852795994719 0.151781067708 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427640599901 0.0609392437508 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.