Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.
To discuss whether young people have influence on the orientation of our society is equivalent to whether young people are important to it, and to whether we realize this importance if there exists one. To my understanding, the role of youth in determining the future of society is pivotal and is increasingly recognized as so. Undoubtedly, they influence on our society in some aspects, such as the Internet, education and their future impact.
First, browsing through the website, it can be found that young people account for the majority group in any prevalent Internet forum, such that they affect the network behavior and culture. Increasingly sophisticated and popular as the communication technology is, smartphones, laptops and variety of chatting apps have come together into young people's life. The young group becomes so significant in this virtual world that they draw huge attentions from such organizations as media, companies and manufacturers. Media is willing to focus on them, not only because of the recognition of the youth's influence, but for that they could bring a huge profit to media. For example, some established football clubs would elaborate advertisements more likely for their young supporters to fascinate them and continue to sell them peripheral products. Such companies or media are more interested in young people, and less so in other groups, because their targets are the most influential group on the website, the atmosphere of which is consequently influenced by such a group.
Second, there also exists an orientation led by young people in education, especially when they are expected by the society to behave and study well. Admittedly, educational policies are made by the department of education. But it is the reaction of the youth to their educational atmosphere that influences that of the policy-maker. On one hand, since each youngster is expected to be ambitious, creative and diligent, a set of educational plans have to be made to act so. On the other hand, it is occasionally reported that some problems such as campus violence occur in high school, or that there exists such inappropriate behaviour of teachers as corporal punishment or incompetent ability of teaching. Then the authority will respond to these problems. Just like what the department of education do not long ago, when they warn that teachers are not allowed to make money by teaching their own students outside the school. Such a ubiquitous phenomenon harmed the quality of education but caused widespread concern, because young people are the focus of our society and they have a strong influence on it by affecting the educational policies.
In a nutshell, though young people do not infuse all aspects of society, they do have influence on its future through the Internet and education owing to their importance both in the present and in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mohammad9090 | 90 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | nusybah | 76 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | fafar | 80 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | Seema Modak | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | Biz Biz | 80 | view |
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. 90
- work 70
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, so, then, well, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2423.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 466.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19957081545 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95226954821 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 765.9 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.8796390831 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.611111111 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8888888889 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259645783078 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823417804972 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827556379764 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19848144924 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102978204351 0.0645574589148 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.