The general welfare of a nation's people is a better indication of that nation's greatness than are the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The author of the issue highlights that a nation's greatness could be found in general well-being of people in any given society rather than the success of artists, scientists, and rulers. Due to the controversial nature of this question, there is not a general argument on this issue. I am, however, to a great extent of the conviction that despite the importance of artists or scientists achievements, the welfare of people play a consequential role when it comes to the greatness of a nation. The following paragraphs will aptly substantiate my personal stance.
To commence with, there is no doubt that artists or scientists are the symbols of success in any given nation and with their achievements provide an opportunity for a society to make a progress day in day out. But they could not guarantee the well-being of a society. Broadly speaking, the greatness of a society is summarized in its people and their welfare and if they live in a harsh situation in spite of great artists and scientists, hardly can we named any society a great nation. As a tangible example, there are vast majorities of scientists and artists in Iran with remarkable achievements but it is not logical to named Iran a great society owing to the paucity of the well-being of people. To elucidate more on this issue, if the welfare of people is a great indication of greatness or success, there is no doubt that achievements of artists or scientists could be a sign of greatness as well.
Another salient point in corroborating my stance is that it is incumbent upon the government to help improve the well-being of people. If we take a minute to ponder over it, it is human's right to live freely with a sense of freedom and the government or leaders should provide fertile ground for people to live without any difficulty. In this situation, no one could neglect the contribution of the government to the greatness of a society. As a vivid example, the United States government always tried to pay tribute to its humans and support them vigorously. In this case, we could call American society a great nation. It can be deduced from a combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that there are many key factors that can play a crucial role in the well-being of people like leaders or the government. So, not only can we name the society a great nation by its government efforts but also can name the government a great success.
However, what was alluded to above can't b overgeneralized to all contexts. Alongside with the innumerable benefits it has, indisputably, scientists and artists are the better symbols of greatness because they have always made an effort to help the society make a progress. For example, scientists have always had incentive and motivation to push the society forward by their discoveries or artists bend over backward to introduce the culture of a nation beyond the borders of the country. Although these achievements might be trivial or not being flamboyant, the startling fact which flabbergasted me is that scientists and artists or rulers are the best indication of success and the greatness of a nation.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
- tpo 51 3
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 50
- Children at age 15 or 16 should do part-time jobe.Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. 73
- TPO 49 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...e author of the issue highlights that a nations greatness could be found in general wel...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... However, what was alluded to above cant b overgeneralized to all contexts. Alon...
^^^^
Line 7, column 262, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'progress'.
Suggestion: progress
...made an effort to help the society make a progress. For example, scientists have always ha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, broadly speaking, for example, in general, no doubt, in spite of, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 85.0 58.6224719101 145% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2651.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 544.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87316176471 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82947280553 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93090981566 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426470588235 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 828.0 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.499632652 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.238095238 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9047619048 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210921283818 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06423910257 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594360974882 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115885748255 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700203209868 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.