The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls, provided into three categories, from 1995-2000
The graph illustrates the amount of time of phone call by local - fixed line, national and international - fixed line and mobiles (all calls) between 1995 and 2002.
Overall, while mobiles and national and international tended to rise over the years, local showed a decrease after the prosperous period in 1999. Mobiles and national and international trended to increase slightly during the periods. Mobiles provided the least total of minutes about 3 billion in 1995, and this development still kept under 10 billion until 1998. In contrast, the number of minutes of national and international reached to approximately 40 billion in 1995. There was a stable climb to 50 billion in 1999 and this number had five times compared to mobiles in the same year. From 2000 to 2002, both had a minimal change before hitting to over 60 billion for national and international, and 45 billion for mobiles.
Local took the dominant part in the total number of minutes, more than 70 billion in 1995 climbing up to the highest peak in 1999 at 90 billion. A decline after 3 years remained exactly the number at the first period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-03 | Thaihaaaaaaa | 89 | view |
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem? 67
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. Agree or disagree? 11
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 78
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. What are those problems? In order to reduce the problems, should we discourage people to use cars? 61
- The graph shows the amount of junk food in Uk 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, still, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8835978836 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66371258029 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582010582011 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6083723211 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.555555556 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223521900466 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946566381418 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733230979347 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130640694046 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793533552441 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.