The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
The table illustrates how the average distance in miles changed with various transports per traveller in England in 1985 and 2000. Overall, there was a significant rise in average of distance by all modes in the period of 15 years from 1985.
Starting with private transports, it can be noted that the average distance of car was dramatically higher than that of walking and bicycle which increased from 3199 miles in 1985 to 4806 miles in 2000. Contrarily, walking and bicycle showed a slight decrease at 237 and 41 miles respectively in 2000. Then, public conveyances had two different trends. The average amount of length of local bus was noticeably higher than the others in the same category in 1985 before falling nearly a half to 274 miles in 2000. Nevertheless, this sort of data of the other vehicles in this group grew much higher in 2000 at 124, 366, and 42 miles of long distance bus, train and taxi respectively. Other modes of travel also rose approximately 100 miles in average distance from 1985 to 2000 leading the total average space increased from 4740 to 6475.
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem? 67
- There is an increasing trend around the world to have a small family rather than a large family What are some of the advantages and disadvantages of having a small family rather than a large family 76
- as well as making money, Companies should have a social responsibilities 89
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. 78
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls provided into three categories from 1995 2000 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nevertheless, so, then, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79679144385 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60456904676 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577540106952 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4662793586 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.125 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182298747489 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895590672954 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847610535458 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185289945727 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717263278615 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.