Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public
transport systems.
These days the developmental boundlessness of science and technology of the whole countries in the world, leading to the transparent innovation in the infrastructure of transportation. Investing the monetary fluxes acts a fundamentalist role in cultivating in roads and motorways, therefore, we cannot forgo the considerable contribution of public transport systems. This essay supposes that we need contemporaneously thrive two fields because their development is interdependent.
In the one hand, by concentrating on upgrading transport road systems and intersections will tremendously diminish the traffic congestion, bring vast benefits for many aspects of countries. Firstly, principal cities of the country have high-level population density, by processing to upgrade road capacity, the speed of traffic circulation considerably enlarge thus foster the economic growth speed. Currently, governments immensely interest in conducting projects of expanding road systems. Secondly, having airy roads and motorways can minimize costs of repair and maintenance. It can save the national budget and concentrate the capital for assisting other social sectors.
In the other hand, the public transport system is indispensable element when the population in the entire world are interruptedly increasing and the requirement for transportation is extending day-by-day. The development of public transport systems will obviously mitigate traffic congestion. Because of their unhurried velocity or prefigured programming, traffic accidents lessen. Furthermore, using public transportation curtail emissions to the environment from personal vehicles in order to cleanse the air environment.
In conclusion, owing to the aforementioned arguments, it seems to me that we should invest monetarily in both roads and public transportation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-16 | kakaloc1681998 | 11 | view |
| 2018-05-16 | kakaloc1681998 | 11 | view |
- There are many different types of music in the world today. Why dowe need music? Is the traditional music of a country more importantthan the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays? 56
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 89
- Some people think that video games are advantageous while others believe video games are harmful to the people who play them Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on publictransport systems. 11
- We can not help everyone in the world that needs help so we should only be concerned with our own community and country to what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... their development is interdependent. In the one hand, by concentrating on upg...
^^^^
Line 2, column 681, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tal for assisting other social sectors. In the other hand, the public transport ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... order to cleanse the air environment. In conclusion, owing to the aforemention...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n both roads and public transportation.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.24110671937 5.12529762239 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.57190244656 2.80592935109 127% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.648221343874 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6993404918 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.461538462 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0789329351705 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0298412846552 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387712802687 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0460618437927 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350680330002 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.91 12.4159519038 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.94 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.