Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People in the past are more interested in improving their neighborhood (the area where they live) than now.
The common fact that people in the past were more fond of ameliorating their neighborhood compared to the present time is one of the recent debates of today’s world. I personally hold the view that this is a valid assumption to make because of the particular conditions of past decades.
First and foremost, the people in the past were more attached to their local area than now. The particular societal norms of last century required the members of a local community to deepen their bonds with their neighbors and live dependently among them. Therefore, this lifestyle generated the sense of belonging to their area of living among local residents which fostered the tendency toward improving their residential area. When all the members of a neighborhood shouldered the responsibility to devote monetary recourses or physical contributions to their place of living, it created an epidemic synergic effect which ran through other parts of the city. Consequently, it became a conventional morality accepted by every member of a society.
More importantly, considering the industrialization era of the past century, governments were merely busy with developing their production capacities, thus they avoided to allocate adequate budgets to create or enhance acceptable and livable urban areas. Hence, there was no other alternative for local civilians but to burden this arduous task themselves. Since they had the desire to live more conveniently in their residential area, the idea of developing it grabbed their attention. My grandfather, for instance, were managed to establish the first retail store in their neighborhood. I clearly remember that he mentioned his intention of such decision was providing an easy access to life necessities for all local residents including his own family.
Taken together, I subscribe to the idea that people were more interested in improving their local area since the sense of attachment to the neighborhood were more strong in the past compared to the current period of time.
- Some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events.Do you think this is positive or negative development? 84
- Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skill 84
- In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there.What is your opinion about this? 84
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People in the past are more interested in improving their neighborhood (the area where they live) than now. 79
- do you agree or disagree with this statement? sometimes people think nowadays the media are less concern about the accuracy of news than in the past 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoided allocating'.
Suggestion: avoided allocating
... their production capacities, thus they avoided to allocate adequate budgets to create or enhance a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 671, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'easy access'.
Suggestion: easy access
...ntention of such decision was providing an easy access to life necessities for all local resid...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 207, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ong in the past compared to the current period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35423197492 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02779126977 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570532915361 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5298401546 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.384615385 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5384615385 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307014634014 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110186257269 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930187621839 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192999240051 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476130662038 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.