The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate at fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The visual information exhibits the regularity of Americans dining out at fast food restaurants from 2003 to 2013.
Looking at the data, in 2003, less than 5% of Americans eat out daily. This number is almost equal to the total number of Americans who never dine out in these places. Another highlight is that 3 out of 4 Americans preferred to eat at restaurants once a week, which gained the highest percentage among all the other categories. Surprisingly, people who visit these kinds of restaurants once or twice a month almost showed the same percentage, about 30, to the ones who eat out one time a week. In addition, an average of 12-17% of individuals opt to eat junk food a few times a year and several times a week.
Fast forward to 2013, a similar trend can be seen wherein fewer Americans choose to dine at fast food restaurants every day while the others do not at all which is around less than 5%. On the other hand, citizens who eat junk food once or twice a month showed the largest proportion with a little over 30% while Americans who dine out once a week is just approximately 3% shy. Finally, less than a quarter of citizens regularly visit fast food restaurants several times a week and a few times a year.
All in all, it can be said that, for 10 years, the pattern of how frequently Americans eat at fast food chains are somewhat similar.
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate at fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate at fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20% in the last ten years. Discuss the causes and effects of this disturbing trend. 78
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate at fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- THE PERCENTAGE OF OVERWEIGHT CHILDREN IN WESTERN SOCIETY HAS INCREASED BY 20 % IN THE LAST 10 YEARS. DISCUSS THE CAUSES AND EFFECTS OF THIS DISTURBING TREND 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, look, so, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1126.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54032258065 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5745770391 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532258064516 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1397361326 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.6 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226437828251 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103973743764 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762309691973 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176214895149 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583923325119 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.