TPO-14 - Integrated Writing Task
Both reading and lecture discuss the salvage logging. According to the reading, The author asserts that this method is beneficial for forest and economy and provides three competing reasons, which all are rejected by the lecturer. The lecture illustrates the idea that salvage logging may appear helpful buy in the actual term it would not be a long-term impact and is questionable; moreover, the professor cites three reasons to reject the points in the reading.
First of all, the reading passage asserts that salvage logging, which removes the dead tree, causes that new trees have a space for growing because no trees would grow on the cramped sites. The professor, on the contrary, casts doubt on this claim by saying that cleaning the site by salvage logging does not necessarily provide a right condition. The decomposed dead tree cause to rich soil and improve the richness of the soil. Therefore, The dead trees are very crucial for the soils which lack nutrients component.
Secondly, the article claims that rooting wood is a proper place for insects which can damage the forest. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes this claims and points out that even though the dead tree increase the insect and provide a habitat for insects, but insects are not bad for the forests because insects live in the forest more than 100 years and do not damage the forests. In addition, the decaying wood is a place for birds which contribute to the forest in a long-term and are important for the forests.
Finally, according to the reading passage, the author says that not only has to salvage logging economic advantages, but also provide an opportunity to create jobs for local people. The speaker, however, denies the points of the author and asserts that the economic benefits of salvage logging are very small an would not last for a long time. Additionally, the salvage logging does only by helicopter which costs a great deal of money and is very expensive. In terms of creating a job for local residents, Moreover, the professor says that the jobs which are being created by salvage logging is temporary, and the people who can carry out logging is outsiders and experienced people other than local people.
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing TaskCarved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types of 76
- TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task 73
- TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task 85
- TPO-47 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...efits of salvage logging are very small an would not last for a long time. Additio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, in addition, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1848.0 1373.03311258 135% => OK
No of words: 375.0 270.72406181 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.928 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4401879709 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485333333333 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 556.2 419.366225166 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.0763654731 49.2860985944 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 110.228320801 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7857142857 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 7.06452816374 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458374929495 0.272083759551 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159196585643 0.0996497079465 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694836261789 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258688584221 0.162205337803 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734353448315 0.0443174109184 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.