Students in schools and university learns for more from lessons with their teachrs compared to other sources , such as television or the Internet . Do you agree or disagree ?
Learning methods can be categorized into at least two groups: the first group is traditional learning method is schools and the second one is multi-media assisted methods mainly through the internet or TV. Some people posit that the traditional was is always the best while other stick to the modern methods of remote learning via computer or TV. This essay discusses both sides and provides a few reasons and examples why learning at school from the teacher is more effective.
Generally speaking, it has been a great opportunity for the students that learning resources such as TV or the internet became available in recent years, These resources are readily accessible to the public and as a matter of fact, they can save a lot of unnecessary cost and energy as people can stay at home and learn. Take a remote university class for example; people can attend the virtual class, listen to the lectures, ask questions in the chatroom without even getting out of their room. I am pretty sure that everyone agrees that remote learning resources are so precious but the question is that are they good enough to replace the schools and universities. In the next paragraph, I will discuss demerits of such remote resources and provide some reasons why we must keep traditional learning methods.
Resources such as TV or the internet are virtual environments that can be used for learning but still possess a lot of other stuff like online games, TV shows,..., that can be a source of distraction for learners. Therefore, the student that is using such a resource is more prone to be distracted and it is a big disadvantage. Another demerit of remote learning resources is that people may procrastinate more before learning as they know it is always available on the internet or even if it is a TV program they know that the playback will be also shown another day. On the contrary, people sitting in a physical class listening to the professor never miss a chance to learn as they know the professor probably never repeats the materials.
Learning is so crucial for students and nowadays with the availability of both schools and remote learning resources like TV and internet people can opt to pay attention to the quality of learning or their convenience during learning. I believe quality comes with more effort and think students should stick to their schools and universities for learning better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-24 | Mehdi.Babaie | 73 | view |
- Television has improved the quality of life for the the ordinary person Do you agree or diagree 91
- Some people believe that it is more important to teIch children the literature of their own country than of other countries. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Music should not be taught in schools. Instead, other subjects such as compurers and science should be taught. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- You recently attended a meeting at a hotel. When you returned home, you found you had left some important papers at the hotelWrite a letter to the manager of the hotel, in your letterSay where you think you left the papersExplain why they are so important 73
- Nowadays, people living in large cities face many problems in their daily lives. What are these problems? Do you think the government should encourage people to move to smaller towns? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 159, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
... other stuff like online games, TV shows,..., that can be a source of distraction ...
^^
Line 8, column 356, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...r schools and universities for learning better.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, still, therefore, while, at least, for example, such as, as a matter of fact, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92383292383 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70115658255 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486486486486 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 614.7 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.9136062238 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.153846154 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3076923077 20.7667163134 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273698889411 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111642375068 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676218234452 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187897552949 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688963293296 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.