Some people find that following a strict routine allows them to feel more in control. Others, however, think that constant changes to the routine make life more interesting and less predictable.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and/or experience.
People often approach life in different ways. Some prefer doing things routinely as it offers them more control in life. While others want to change things every now and then to make life more exciting. Personally, I prefer constancy in my professional life while maintaining spontaneity in my leisure life.
By practicing routines, one is able to master their job and gain the ability to anticipate any complications. For instance, any deviation from the normal practice will alert one to check for mistakes, therefore, allowing errors to be troubleshoot early before it becomes a bigger problem. Thus, routine practice is a check and balance system that enables a person to feel more in control at the workplace.
Although the former system provides an efficient working habit, in other aspects of our life, approaching it in the same manner, may feel tedious. Even the most pleasurable activities, if done this way, may start to feel old and uninteresting. On the other hand, lost interest can be renewed if we approach old things in a different light. For instance, regular exercise is a difficult lifestyle to maintain but, by incorporating fun elements such as music and dance, people are able to cope up and continue being active. Hence, by approaching life in a variety of ways, we are able to keep our spirit high and keep our motivations going.
To conclude, I find that routine practices are helpful in minimizing mistakes and enable us to work efficiently. While changing things constantly affects other areas of our life positively by renewing our energy and keeping our life more interesting.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-21 | Hyacinthos | 39 | view |
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 11
- A large number of private cars on the roads in many parts of the world has led to serious problems of pollution and may contribute to global warming Some people think that governments should spend more money for the development of public transportation sy 45
- In the past shopping was a routine domestic task. Many people now-a -days regard it as a hobby.To what extent do you think it is a positive trend. 84
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantage of this outweigh the disadvantages? 70
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: EVERY_NOW_AND_THEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'now and then'.
Suggestion: now and then
...ife. While others want to change things every now and then to make life more exciting. Personally,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07518796992 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85604450594 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62030075188 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2603961166 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4285714286 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219108870901 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787220884839 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718942350657 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134489783037 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592849573005 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.