Do you agree or disagree: young people should try many different kinds of jobs or career before they decide the long term career of their life.
It is usually difficult for young people who have not much work experience to decide whether they should change their career now. Apparently, there are no absolutely right answers to the question. But for me, I think young people shouldn’t try too many totally different jobs before they decide on their career for the rest of their lives.
First of all, changing your job too frequently will result in a large cost of living, which may occur big trouble in your early career. Most young people have not much money because of lacking work experience and low salaries in the beginning. They have to spend additional cost on transport, accommodation, and so on when they relocate for another job. One of my classmates, Jim, who went to university with a student loan. After he graduated from the university, none of any jobs he did lasted more than 3 months. At the end, he has problem repaying his loan.
Another point is that, you have to spend more energy on skills that you don’t need for the career path you eventually decide to follow. Every job has unique requirements of professional skills, which may take years to be trained for and to master. But most of this professional skills can’t help if you change to another new career, and then you find that you just have been wasting your time on useless things. For example, I had been studying day and night to figure out a professional software for capturing economic data in my first job. However, this special skill plays no role in my second job in chemistry. In another word, I sacrificed my time and energy to gain something useless for my development.
Last but not least, it may be hard to focus on the present work after changing jobs frequently. Young people may be unsatisfied with the current jobs because they believe a more rewarding, more suitable job is waiting for them. For this reason, it is difficult to concentrate on your current job, which may result in a decrease in efficiency at work and the chance of getting a promotion.
In a word, young people not only can’t benefit much from trying too many jobs, but also could harm their career.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-27 | chensixian | 76 | view |
| 2018-12-27 | chensixian | 70 | view |
| 2018-12-27 | chensixian | 76 | view |
| 2018-08-26 | yoonjung1917@gmail.com | 80 | view |
| 2018-05-30 | miyamoto | 73 | view |
- Do memories hinder or help people in their effort to learn from the past andsucceed in the present? Plan and write an essay in which you develop your point of view on thisissue. Support your position with reasoning and examples taken from your reading, s 73
- In universities, people tend to concern more about the career prospect of the subjects they learn. Some people propose that students should learn subjects with a fast job growth including math, science, technology, and engineering even if they are interes 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The way a person dresses reflects his/her characters. 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? If people want to fully enjoy their vacations, they should leave their cellphones home. 90
- Do you agree or disagree: young people should try many different kinds of jobs or career before they decide the long term career of their life. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'last'
Suggestion: last
...the university, none of any jobs he did lasted more than 3 months. At the end, he has ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, for example, i think, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1776.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 374.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7486631016 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58938963077 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4719354643 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4736842105 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6842105263 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26315789474 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280069268982 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851170402822 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098173030684 0.0737576698707 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182732892463 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106013058642 0.0645574589148 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.