" The table shows the figure for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980."
The diagram below helps to compare the figures for imprisonments in various countries between 1930 and 1980.
It is clearly visible from the table that there were great fluctuations and the height of figures has changed during the given period.The smallest amount of prisoners belongs to Great Britain which has grown from 30000 to 80000 between decades. Meanwhile, in Australia the level of imprisonment fluctate in different years and finally became the smallest index among five countries in 1980.
In 1930 the quantity of prisons was balanced in New Zealand and United States, but during the years this equality has changed. For instance, at last example the indicator of New Zealand decreases, but in United States the height of the figure became the greatest among the given countries in 1980.The amount of prisons in Canada was worrying in 1930 but during 51 years it decreased and became the second biggest indicator in 1980.
- The table below shows the consumer durables owned in Britain from 1972 to 1983. 80
- The graph below shows the cinema attendance of people on different days of the week in 2003, 2005 and 2007 83
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it better if more good news was reported? 64
- The following are two filter systems Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 79
- The diagram below shows the development of the village of Kelsby between 1780 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
Sentence: Meanwhile, in Australia the level of imprisonment fluctate in different years and finally became the smallest index among five countries in 1980.
Error: fluctate Suggestion: fluctuate
flaws:
Always put a space after punctuation marks. E-rater is sensitive.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 5 10
No. of Words: 155 200
No. of Characters: 768 1000
No. of Different Words: 86 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.528 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.955 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.416 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 62 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 44 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 23 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 14 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 31 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 13.726 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.519 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.791 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.087 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4