As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
The issue claims that our ability to think for ourselves deteriorates with our inclination towards technology. However, there are innumerable advantages of technology in human life that simply cannot be overshadowed by one mere assumption.
By providing immediate and timely solutions to our smallest of concerns, technology not only saves time but also lifts those concerns of our minds for quite some time. Our lives today have become extremely fast paced that we hardly have any time to spare for unnecessary issues. Let us consider the example of a chef or a dentist who does not have a technological background and faces some trouble with his/her laptop. Now, we definitely wouldn’t expect them to resolve the problem just by mere thinking. Two options exist in this case – they can either consult a friend or an expert or simply look it up on the internet if the issue is a basic one. This not only saves time but also saves them from the embarrassment of approaching someone even for the minuscule of problems.
Another example would be the case of an avid reader who is passionate about the books written by a specific author. When an expected novel hasn’t come to his/her nearest bookstore yet, they can purchase one online if available. This saves them the time and effort of trying to find other bookstores nearby. Technology thus has only simplified our lives in ways more than what a few examples can describe.
However, in some cases, technology does seem to be a bane rather than a boon. Often when looking up something on the internet we do get carried away to multiple other websites we did not intend to look into. This consumes our time horrendously and might disturb our social lives as well. We also tend to rely on technology too much that sometimes we prefer to stay at home and chill rather than actually go out and socialize with people. In the name of being independent, we gradually only get ourselves into a cocoon of life. And this might deteriorate our ability to think for ourselves as well.
Overall, there are multiple ways to look at the pros and cons of the benefits that technology provides us. However when it comes to the simplifying things the way we like in today’s world, technology does prove to be a boon.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | tarun9927 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | vivek2upad | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 54 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 54
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people Recently however archaeol 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 108, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...e benefits that technology provides us. However when it comes to the simplifying things...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, look, so, thus, well, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1888.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81632653061 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68752633338 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558673469388 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.1799541634 60.3974514979 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.4 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121432335569 0.243740707755 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0379979360357 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413290069997 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0719857000963 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309288073469 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.