Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last year was twice as high as that of Fitch and included home sales that averaged $168,000, compared to Fitch's $144,000. Homes listed with Adams sell faster as well: ten years ago I listed my home with Fitch, and it took more than four months to sell; last year, when I sold another home, I listed it with Adams, and it took only one month. Thus, if you want to sell your home quickly and at a good price, you should use Adams Realty.
Here the editor is comparing two real estate firms and giving his verdict on which one of them is better. It is apparently clear from the reasoning given by the author that he has taken certain assumptions to reach this conclusion. We can find a different explanation for these, which will render the aforementioned assumptions unwarranted.
First, the author assumed that more the workers better the firm. What if the workers of Adam’s firm were not diligent enough when pitched against the 25 workers of Fitch’s firm. The assumption will fail if the less number of employees of Fitch were contributing much more to the firm. Second, although, a higher revenue sales is a measure of success, average home sales is not. Author assumed that houses sold by Adam’s firm belonged to a same range that is, standard deviation from the average value was not much. What will make this assumption fail is when Adam’s firm sold houses which were exorbitantly priced combined with moderately priced which will make their average higher while on the other hand Flitch’ firm sold houses which were in the vicinity of the average value given above.
Third, editor talks about his experience with both the firms but does not mention any details about the house, be it location, size or price. Without providing this information one cannot successfully make connection with the point being made. It’s plausible that when author was selling his house with Fitch’s firm the market was experiencing a low or maybe the location was a rustic one which attracted very little interest of buyers or the price may have been priced capriciously ignoring the appropriate one. Efficiency of the two firms would have been comparable if these conditions would have been similar to the present one when he used the services of Adam.
Finally, to conclude off I would like to point out that author’s argument can also be justified by the assumptions made above. To provide a better context on this author could provide statistics of both the firms to give readers a better look at the situation of both firms. However, as proper statistics are lacking in the reasoning presented here, the conclusion made above is fallacious.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | sapana | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | stevewang1007 | 79 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | siirsalvador | 75 | view |
| 2019-09-17 | suhas201227 | 83 | view |
| 2019-09-09 | mehdi2020 | 63 | view |
- A recent study of Dura-Socks customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process, which ensures that our socks are strong enough to last for two years. We have always advertised our use of the En 32
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 50
- Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last year was twice 82
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries. 66
Comments
Essay evaluation report
argument 1 -- OK
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- OK
----------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 369 350
No. of Characters: 1793 1500
No. of Different Words: 190 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.383 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.859 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.515 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 119 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 84 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 53 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.062 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.562 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.315 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.542 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.113 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 599, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
...ave been comparable if these conditions would have been similar to the present one when he used...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, finally, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.6327345309 117% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 13.6137724551 118% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 55.5748502994 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 2260.96107784 83% => OK
No of words: 369.0 441.139720559 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07859078591 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71212114218 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 204.123752495 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542005420054 0.468620217663 116% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 705.55239521 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6674619679 57.8364921388 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.125 119.503703932 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0625 23.324526521 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.70786347227 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158979656961 0.218282227539 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052574194534 0.0743258471296 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543907161377 0.0701772020484 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0847798776794 0.128457276422 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491897769626 0.0628817314937 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.3799401198 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.3550499002 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 98.500998004 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.