The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in millions) of telephone calls in Finland, divided into three categories, from 1995 – 2004.
The given chart illustrates how many minutes of telephone calls there were Finland in terms of local-landline, national and international-landline, and mobiles over the course of 9 years starting from 1995.
Looking at the report, it is immediately obvious that in 9 years, there was a decided upward trend in the number of minutes of mobiles and national and international–landline calls, while local-landline calls saw the same tendency from 1995 to 2001, then fell minimally in 2004. However, local-landline calls were the largest throughout the period.
As can be seen from the chart, there were 12000 million minutes of local-landline calls, which was the highest in 1995, followed by national and international-landline calls with 6000 million minutes. In the same year, mobiles were hardly used. Nevertheless, after 6 years, there was a significant increase to nearly 6000 million in the quantity of minutes of mobiles calls. Similarly, local-landline and national and international calls experienced a considerable rise to 15000 and 9000 million minutes respectively in 2001.
Then, in the next 5 years, local-landline calls fell marginally to 12000 million minutes, while the figure of minutes of mobiles and national and international calls continued to go up to 10000 and 11000 million in turn in 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-11 | minhchau2205 | 87 | view |
- The pie charts below give information about world population in 1900 and 2000 89
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in millions of telephone calls in Finland divided into three categories from 1995 2004 87
- The pie charts below give information about world population in 1900 and 200 61
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in millions) of telephone calls in Finland, divided into three categories, from 1995 – 2004. 61
- The table below shows the average band scores for students from different language groups taking the IELTS General Test in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and national and international–landline calls, while local-landline calls saw th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, nevertheless, similarly, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 5.05154639175 218% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 32.9175257732 6% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 26.3917525773 140% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 937.175257732 120% => OK
No of words: 205.0 206.0 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46341463415 4.54256449028 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.78020617076 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.69798568897 2.54303337028 145% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 127.690721649 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526829268293 0.622605031667 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 328.5 290.88556701 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.83505154639 218% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 16.3608247423 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.7689745212 44.8134815571 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.0 76.5299724578 183% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 16.8248392259 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 4.34317383033 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24153204754 0.216113520407 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115764288373 0.0766984524023 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06803745272 0.0603063233224 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170336014603 0.12726935374 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245826711578 0.0580467560999 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 8.37731958763 204% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 70.7449484536 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 7.45979381443 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 8.71597938144 168% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 7.59969072165 103% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 41.2886597938 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 8.62886597938 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 8.54432989691 140% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 8.15463917526 184% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.