The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the united kingdom, sweaden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given graph revels the information about the carbon dioxide emitted by per person in the four countries ( United kingdom, Sweaden, Italy and Portugal ) with in duration of 40 years from 1967 to 2007. The given data is calibrated in metric tonnes.
It can be seen that in the year 1967, United kingdom had the maximum emission of carbon dioxide which was about 11 metric tonnes, following with Sweaden which was nearly 8.75 metric tonnes, then Italy with emission slightly more than 4 metric tonnes and least emission from Portugal. In addition to this, Italy and Portugal followed the same trend. Moreover, Italy and Portugal had the emission of 7.5 and 5.25 metric tonnes respectively.
Moving further, CO2 emission was sharply risen by nearly 1.25 metric tonnes from Sweden. Apart from this, both Sweden and Portugal had emission same quantity of carbon dioxide gas in the year of 2007. There was fall seen in the emission of carbon dioxide by the Sweaden from 1977 till 2007. Furthermore, CO2 emitted by United kingdom in the year 1987, 1997 and 2007 was 10, nearly 9.75 and approximately 9 metric tonnes respectively.
Overall, I conclude by saying that both United kingdom and Sweaden had shown the downward trend whereas, Italy as well as Portugal showed the opposite trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-11 | Nikhil Dutt Sharma | 67 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the results of survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on 2 groups of workers: those aged from 18-30 and those aged 45-60, and shows factors affecting their work performance. 67
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide ( CO2) emission per person in the united kingdom, sweaden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 67
- The chart gives the information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projected for 2050. 67
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the united kingdom, sweaden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons wher 67
- The chart below gives information about Southland's main export in 2000, 2013 and future projections for 2025. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tted by per person in the four countries United kingdom, Sweaden, Italy and Portu...
^^
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted kingdom, Sweaden, Italy and Portugal with in duration of 40 years from 1967 t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, moreover, so, then, well, whereas, apart from, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1075.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34999280806 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497674418605 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.9205418117 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275380536807 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123688991945 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809665870119 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189524088303 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502847959255 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.