University should accept equal number of male and female students in every subject. Do you agree or disagree?
There is a general controversy on whether university should have the equality of gender in the number of students in each major. While I accept that this idea could bring the several benefits for students, I believe that it is not necessary to recruit equal quantity of boys and girls in a class.
On the one hand, the same figure of men and women in each subject may built a comfortable and convenient environment of study for students. In deed, people are usually under pressure when they are staying with the large number of peers who have the opposite gender. For example, if a student is the only boy in a class, he would be paid attention a lot from others, especially from the teacher, which is probably the most annoying and worrying thing for anyone in the university. Also, he could be regarded as a weird person because he select the subject that is tendentiously not preferred by boys. Furthermore, he may find it difficult to choose a friend for chatting or a partner for doing project.
On the other hand, it is not always easy and essential to have the balance number of male and female students in every major. It might be due to the fact that the natural interests and overall academic performances of both sexes are not often identical to each other. For instance, most of girls are not interested and good at science, so it is really difficult for them to compete against boys in the math class. Also, the major they study in the University has a significant impact on their future jobs and obviously, certain jobs are gender-specific. One example of this is that it is unrealistic for a woman to become a plumber or a construction worker. Therefore, students should be given the freedom of what they enjoy studying.
In conclusion, while I support the idea that university should recruit equal number of boys and girls in each class in order to create the comfortable study environment, the same figure of male and female students is by no means vital in every subject because of the differences in their interests and academic abilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-13 | minhchau2205 | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in millions) of telephone calls in Finland, divided into three categories, from 1995 – 2004. 61
- The pie charts below give information about world population in 1900 and 200 61
- University should accept equal number of male and female students in every subject. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people think that governments should give financial supportto creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believethat creative artists should be funded by alternative sources.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in millions of telephone calls in Finland divided into three categories from 1995 2004 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the girls') or simply say ''most girls''.
Suggestion: most of the girls; most girls
... identical to each other. For instance, most of girls are not interested and good at science,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...their interests and academic abilities.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, may, really, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 5.60731707317 482% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 965.302439024 177% => OK
No of words: 362.0 196.424390244 184% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71270718232 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 3.73543355544 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70605456271 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 106.607317073 172% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505524861878 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 546.3 283.868780488 192% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5622112437 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.857142857 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233065680062 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788689485576 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091656403663 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166941050229 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772754831806 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 40.7170731707 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.