The pie charts below give information about world population in 1900 and 200
The pie charts illustrate changes in the population of different areas of the world between 1900 and 2000. The major regions are represented as percentages of the total world population.
From 1900 to 2000, the percentage of people living in Africa more than doubled from 4.5% to 10%, while Latin America’s proportion almost tripled in the same period. On the other hand, the percentage of population in Europe and Asia decreased over the last century. Europe’s percentage dropped from 25% to 14%, while Asia declined from 60% to 54%. North America’s percentage however, remained constant at 5% in 1900 and 2000. The Middle East and North Africa, a new category in 2000, represented 6% of world population.
Overall, this represents a huge increase in the number of humans on the planet, from 1.6 billion to 6 billion in just one century. Most of this population growth has occurred in developing countries.
- The table below shows the average band scores for students from different language groups taking the IELTS General Test in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- University should accept equal number of male and female students in every subject. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The table below shows the number of medals won by the top ten countries in the London 2012 Olympic Games.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people think that governments should give financial supportto creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believethat creative artists should be funded by alternative sources.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in millions of telephone calls in Finland divided into three categories from 1995 2004 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 782.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17880794702 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94036751969 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602649006623 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.280255008 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8888888889 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7777777778 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146948815476 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709887536837 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896651985633 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125094668557 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107729618771 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.