Nowadays, there is an ongoing debate on choosing the subjects between literature and films, which attracted numerous controversies and drawn the attention from the public. It can be said that choosing literature can be a good option, while on the other hand stands a perspective that studying the newly emerged field film has better career oppertunities. This essay will further elaborate on both sides and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are innumerable benefits of learning the history and literature subjects but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact of increasing awareness about the traditional values and beliefs because by studying the literature heads the individuals can grow the understanding about their national older rituals. As an illustration, according to a stratling new reaserch published in The Historical revealed that in China and India Literature is a compulsory subject so their citizens are more aware about the traditional values.
Notwithstanding, some people hold an opposing view and tend to believe that studying films can help the learners to earn more in their career because this field is very new and big. Moreover, the people who studying media will not onle can get job in their own nation but also can work in other countries. Another benefit of selecting film as a subject is fame because anyone who worked in this field can be popular in a very short period.
In view of the arguments outlined above , one can conclude that studying literature is more productive than films.
- What roles should governments, companies, and individuals play to combat climate change? 77
- Today the elderly people represent a larger proportion of the population than before. What do you think are the impacts of this trend on our future? 77
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 85
- Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of advertisements 75
- Certain kinds of music promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 40, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... In view of the arguments outlined above , one can conclude that studying literatu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, thus, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13438735178 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85538400332 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584980237154 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.6490717522 50.4703680194 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.333333333 104.977214359 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1111111111 20.9669160288 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208622358075 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876363689263 0.0925447433944 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588506839374 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135037764269 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158083599075 0.0609392437508 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.1260098522 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.