The bar chart below shows the number of students in three different courses from 2001-2004. Identify the main trends and summarize the data
The bar chart illustrated the amount of the student’s presence in three main courses between 2001 and 2004.
It is clear that students attended in course C increasing little by little. Meanwhile, course B was subject to overall volatility over four years.
In the first two years, the quantity of students was in course A was likely to decrease from 4,3 millions to 2,5 millions. After a slight lull, the number of students in course A tended to increase to 4.5 millions in two year’s time. Meanwhile, there was a fluctuation in the amount of the attenders in course B and finally stood at nearly 3 millions in 2004.
There was a period of stability in the figure for course C, at 2 millions in 2001 and 2002. After two years, the students were in course C saw increase to the highest point, at 5 millions in 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-05 | Alice Nguyen | view | |
| 2023-09-19 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-29 | chau hoang | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-20 | Sarbasove | 61 | view |
- Financial education should be a mandatory component of the school program. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- The bar graph below shows the number of television receivers per 1000 inhabitants in the world in 1970 and 1997 85
- In some countries where the unemployment rate are high, most students should be offered only primary education. There is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The graphs below show the annual expenditure of university students in three countries in 2003 77
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 688.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 148.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64864864865 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48791127476 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70456017252 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533783783784 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 190.8 283.868780488 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.6070778037 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.0 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250725878733 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126393613563 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957014035134 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186342338923 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109111745578 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.