There are a lot of people tending to move from countryside to urban areas due to a higher standard of life
There are a lot of people tending to move from countryside to urban areas due to a higher standard of life. However, living in a city can bring about many drawbacks. From my point of view, some solutions would be applied by the governments to solve these problems.
Several noticeable disadvantages can easily be anticipated when the number of migrants to urban area is rising day by day. Firstly, a major difficulty is the high cost of living. To live in city, migrants must pay for more type of expenses like rent, ultilities, travelling and so on. Moreover, environment pollution is also a significant issue. Because of the dramatic increase of population, the amount of rubbish in cities is climbing that will lead to soil pollution, air pollution, water pollution. It also causes the noise contamination which has been making people there feel uncomfortable. Last but not least, an overcrowded city could be suffered from traffic congestion. For example, inhabitants of Hanoi, the capital of Viet Nam, must always be annoyed owing to traffic jam in rush hour that can take them more than 30 minutes to go and from work.
There are some actions that governments should take to tackle those problems. One of the most important solutions is building social houses. It can help reduce people in poverty’s fee. Hence, it will be easier for them to maintain their living in urban areas. Besides, governments can also widen the roads for travelling much more fluently. Furthermore, a brilliant idea is encouraging people to use mass transit by declining the fee, improving the quality of facilities and using more modern type of transport like metro system. Finally, developing rural areas to decrease the number of immigrants is also a good way to lighten the burden of cities. Thus, governments should plan and move industry parks to these region and broaden the job opportunities for locals.
In conclusion, governments could certainly implement a range of measures to help the life in urban areas become more livable.
- Writing task 1: TABLE – Using phone 78
- Given are one table and two pie charts. The table provides data of the sum of tourists to Ashdown museum while two charts demonstrate the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visits, during the same periods. 78
- Due to having a more comfortable working life, some people believe that workers should only follow an occupation. While I admit that this option can bring about many beneficial advantages, I would argue that a number of adverse consequences would be gener 84
- It is the commonly believed that we ought to just focus on our own society’s issues because it is impossible to support all the needy 84
- It is evident that the exponential development of technology has had significant influences on various means of people’s communication. While some people claim that it could result in several drawbacks, the opponents still strongly believe that there ar 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 714, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this region' or 'these regions'?
Suggestion: this region; these regions
... should plan and move industry parks to these region and broaden the job opportunities for l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05952380952 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83992206107 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604166666667 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9447043897 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258286189644 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796809341434 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.21370879872 0.0667982634062 320% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196133517236 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.181924721859 0.056905535591 320% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.