Should a city try to preserve its old historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Historic monuments are the buildings which were built in ancient times. As per my opinion, old monuments should be maintained instead of demolishing them and constructing new building at that place. I will justify my opinion in upcoming paragraphs.
A city is always known for its old sculptures and monuments. A city having historical buildings is always considered to be rich in heritage. These depict the history of the place and many memories are associated with them. These places also remind of the life of the ancestors. Some monuments are so uniquely built that new modern technology buildings cannot even copy them. For instance, the metal used in Ashoka temple in Delhi is still a suspense for the scientists. This metal has never got rusted or destroyed. Along with this, these monuments can be the tourist attraction and many people come to see them and admire their Beauty. This also enhances the economic condition of that place and funds which are collected can be used for conserving these buildings.
On the other hand, new modern technology buildings will pose a threat on the environment by creating congested atmosphere. If old monuments will be replaced by the shopping malls or cinema halls, this will also cause menace in the area and there will be no open space left for fresh air. Beside this, new buildings will be equipped with modern equipments which will liberate harmful gases and will affect the surroundings.
In conclusion, cultural heritage should be conserved by repairing and maintaining the old monuments which depict the history of that area.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-19 | Sonia Mirg | 79 | view |
- Some people think that the teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community. They believe this would benefit both the teenagers and society as a whole. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- Should a city try to preserve its old historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09195402299 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68773878088 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567049808429 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3939878369 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0625 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3125 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1875 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234927427384 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824152677317 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590826151267 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140423472377 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675800745215 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.