The first circular layout reveals the information about the responsible causes of less fertilisation of agricultural land and the tabular chart had shown the influenced areas due to those reasons in 1990.
To begin with, over grazing was one of the biggest reason which was responsible for 35% land devastation.After that ,30% of productive land was spoiled by deforestation and over grazing had also put impact on fertility of agriculture land.probing ahead, 7% of unknown causes were also play their part in degradation of productive region of land.
Moving ahead, the table shows the, whole devastation of land in percentage.In North America, there was only 5% of productive region was degrade by over grazing and over cultivation. Whereas 9.8% land was devastated by deforestation in Europe which was bigger rather than others . After that, 11.3% agriculture area became less fertile due to over grazing and 13% of total land was degrade in Oceania
Overall , it is evident that ,majority of agriculture area was devastated by over grazing whereas Europe was region, where maximum land got degraded by the same causes.
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. the table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features , and ma 78
- The diagram below shows the process of making a water clock. 78
- The maps below show an island, before and after construction of some tourist facilities. 84
- Young people in distributed economies tend to become violent causing distraction to life and property. Wha are the causes, impacts and remedies of such problem. 73
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past 30 years in the world that many cities now are "one big traffic jam". Do you think that this statement is true? What measure can government take to address this problem? 35
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...influenced areas due to those reasons in 1990. To begin with, over grazing was o...
^^
Line 2, column 105, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: After
...as responsible for 35% land devastation.After that ,30% of productive land was spoile...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ible for 35% land devastation.After that ,30% of productive land was spoiled by de...
^^
Line 2, column 285, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'played'.
Suggestion: played
...g ahead, 7% of unknown causes were also play their part in degradation of productive...
^^^^
Line 4, column 31, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
... land. Moving ahead, the table shows the, whole devastation of land in percentage...
^^^^
Line 4, column 76, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...whole devastation of land in percentage.In North America, there was only 5% of pro...
^^
Line 4, column 137, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'degraded'.
Suggestion: degraded
...re was only 5% of productive region was degrade by over grazing and over cultivation. W...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 183, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e by over grazing and over cultivation. Whereas 9.8% land was devastated by deforestati...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 278, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rope which was bigger rather than others . After that, 11.3% agriculture area beca...
^^
Line 4, column 400, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...13% of total land was degrade in Oceania Overall , it is evident that ,majority o...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... land was degrade in Oceania Overall , it is evident that ,majority of agricul...
^^
Line 6, column 29, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...Oceania Overall , it is evident that ,majority of agriculture area was devasta...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, whereas, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26666666667 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96841644587 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594444444444 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.7225460881 43.030603864 202% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 189.6 112.824112599 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.0 22.9334400587 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 1.69756097561 707% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136649019393 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870028585857 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400702430118 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0983026648861 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032337040939 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.4 13.2329268293 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.94 61.2550243902 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.51609756098 224% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.3012195122 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.4329268293 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 11.0658536585 190% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.