School teachers are more responsible for social and intellectual development of students than parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the rise in modernization, a man has transformed his life tremendously. He has progressed from walking barefooted in the jungles to take the first step on the moon. Nevertheless, there are some issues which remains irrevocable and as complex as ever. For instance, the given topic asserts that trainer should have responsible for intellectual skill growth of children rather than parents or not? Through this essay, I shall explore the dimensions of this topic with example and good illustration and shape up my opinion by the end.
On one side, there is a group of people Who believe that tutor are responsible for social and intellectual development of students. They have been highly crucial role in children life as a god. Firstly, the teachers had trained in the intellectual growth of courses who are psychological learnt behaviour of children. Secondly, According to my perspective, children could have gained moral values and how to make good ettiqutes in own his life. Moreover, it is learnt for the helps of trainers. The best epitome of this is the United state of America is compulsory taught lesson of ettiqutes for all school children. It is better way to development of children good habits.
On the other hand, parents are wherever, responsible for good intelluctual skill. It is build up in the children life. First and foremost point is children are genetically depended upon behaviour of parents, especially, parents are understood behaviour and habits of children. They have memorable and loveable person in childhood life. Additionally, children do not agree with parents. It is bad impact and update attitude level in children because, it is gap new- generation in between parents. A good illustration this is the psychologist theory is written by gean Piaget say that children behavior genetically on parents behaviour.
To crown it all, I pen down saying that, weighing both the options; I believe that there is no single conclusion still; I take this ground that an effective clap requires both use of hands teacher is responsible for development of intellectual skill in children. Children is easily understood teachers inspiration. It is better way to affection towards children.
- The three pie charts show below the changes in annual spending by particular UK school in 1981 1991 and2001 87
- The people think that the government should invest money in arts and cultural events, while others believe that government should spend money on more important things.discuss both side of view and give your opinion. 67
- The chart give information about rates of smoking in men and women from year 1960 to 2000. 73
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 67
- People say that animal use to testing medicine intended that human use. Other people say it is not right testing medicine use to animals. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sible for good intelluctual skill. It is build up in the children life. First and...
^^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...int is children are genetically depended upon behaviour of parents, especially, p...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r way to affection towards children.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, for instance, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23184357542 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99748784261 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541899441341 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.222997321 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1363636364 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2727272727 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22727272727 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171666965267 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519889560732 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631719665583 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107536899035 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257875511829 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.