School teachers are more responsible for social and intellectual development of students than parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the rise in modernization, a man has transformed his life tremendously. He has progressed from walking barefooted in the jungles to take the first step on the moon. Nevertheless, there are some issues which remains irrevocable and as complex as ever. For instance, the given topic asserts that who is responsible; parents and tutors, for the growth of intellectual skill in children or not? Through this essay, I shall explore the dimensions of this topic with examples and illustration and shape up my opinion by the end.
On one side, according to my perspective, trainer is crucial role in children life. They have good trainer to taught the intellectual and good habits of students. Tutor could have training courses for development of student etiquette. Secondly, they have aware students for crime. It is better way to do counseling of children to secure criminal. Teacher had good quality to motivate the children. The best epitome of this is the Hindustan times was conducted survey and written a news said that, a large number of school trainer could have counsell all children on every weekend and developed the intellectual skill in children life.
On other hand, parents is responsible for developed good habits and intellectual skill of children life. Firstly, parents are easily understood behaviour of children. The students are genetically depended upon parents however, in the modern scenario, parents have been swamped in hectic schedule so they could not enough time to spent with children. Parents do not punshied her children for any mistakes. The best illustration of this is overseas nation parents are do not spend time with student for grown - up intellectual skills.
To crown it all, I pen down saying that, weighing the both options; I believe that there is no single conclusion but still; I take this ground that is an effective clap requires use of both hands and I reckon teacher is "part and parcel" role in the life of children for develop good ettiqutes and aware towards crime.
- Some people support development of agriculture like factory farming and scientific creation of fruits and vegetables While other oppose Discuss both views and give your opinion 55
- Some people support development of agriculture like, factory farming and scientific creation of fruits and vegetables. While other oppose. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
- With the rise of ebooks comes the decline in paper books. Some people see this is good forward step while others do not. What are advantages and disadvantages of this trend? Which do you support. 78
- Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 11
- Some people use the internet to search for solution to their medical problems is it a positive or negative development Example and give your opinion 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 467, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the Hindustan times was conducted survey and written a news said that, a large nu...
^^
Line 3, column 499, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...d survey and written a news said that, a large number of school trainer could have counsell all ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 467, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
... of this is overseas nation parents are do not spend time with student for grown -...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d ettiqutes and aware towards crime.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, for instance, i reckon
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14371257485 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82226137667 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550898203593 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.1674256183 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4444444444 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162530677853 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580230892061 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539161432096 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0958205017915 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423063939618 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.