In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
In any field of inquiry, the beginner is someone who does not have enough information about his or her field and has fresh mind as regards his or her major. This fresh mind of beginners makes significant contributions to consider new ways and discovers creative methods in order to solve a problem. However, there is certain exception at any fields that cannot be overlooked easily; special fields need invaluable experiences of experts to make important contributions.
For instance, at social fields like psychology that behavior of human begins are analyzed to tackle their problems, having a fresh approach helps psychologist to discover new ways. The beginner at this field can consider extra factors that have profound impact on temporary life while the expert does not pay attention to these factors because of narrow approach. Another example is about some beginners who have changed their majors and have different observation on their new majors. These kinds of person would be able to tackle problems with their new vision while are retrospect on their last majors.
The novice also would be able to take different kinds of alternatives because they do not know how they should limit the scope of their research. The investigation of wide variety of resources provides them with the golden opportunity to be creative and make an effort to find best solution for their problems in comparison with their expert counterparts. For example, Khayam was one of big mathematicians in his era, tried to make relationship among mathematics and poet. He did not have any information about poet and was a beginner at this field but his meaningful poets are eminent at this day and age because he wrote his poet at a new way.
Although in some cases, the novice will be able to make noticeable contributions, in certain specific majors, it is more likely that they make an irreversible damage due to lack of experiences. For instance, for managing a big company, a novice manager who do not have any experience, maybe make damages for company and decrease its profit. Therefore, hiring beginners depends on the fields and situations that they work on them. At important situations accepting the ideas of a beginner makes risk and increases problems instead of decreasing them.
In conclusion, taking principle factors into account to use this sentence “in any field of inquiry…” is very important because there are some exceptions that cannot be ignored. The beginner could render new methods and ideas because of their novel vision but it does not mean that they will be able to make important contributions in any fields rather than who are experts. The knowledge of experts could guide the beginners in a straight way and make a synergy in order to find new methods to solve problems.
- Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system.Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds. 74
- Educators should take students interests into account when planning the content of the courses they teach 54
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 64
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field. 56
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents jobs Agree or disagree 79
This fresh mind of beginners makes significant contributions to consider new ways and discovers creative methods in order to solve a problem.
Suggestion: This fresh mind of beginners makes significant contributions to new ways and discovers creative methods in order to solve a problem.
Sentence: The beginner could render new methods and ideas because of their novel vision but it does not mean that they will be able to make important contributions in any fields rather than who are experts.
Description: A conjunction, subordinating is not usually followed by a WH-pronoun, nominative
Suggestion: Refer to than and who
flaws:
Sentence Length SD: 5.959 7.5
Read this link about sentence length SD:
http://www.testbig.com/question/questions-about-essay-e-rater
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 464 350
No. of Characters: 2282 1500
No. of Different Words: 215 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.641 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.918 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.678 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 160 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 121 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 83 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 52 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.778 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.959 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.722 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.322 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.552 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.12 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5