The bar chart and table below give information about heathcare resources and average life expectancy in different countries.
The chart and the table show the relationship between the pattern of government health spending and average lifetime of population in different countries.
Overall, peple in Japan and Netherlands with better healthcare resources supply are likely to live longer than those inl others coutries received worse supply.
It is clear from the chart, Japanese is noticeable for the greatest longevity with 83 years, closely followed by Netherlands, at 80 years. US, which spends twice as much money as Netherlands, at nearly $7000, has the lowest average lifetime in all 3 countries.
Regarding hospital beds per thousand of population, there was a significant difference in 8 countries included 3 countries mentioned above. These figure for Japan, Germany and Netherlands was considerably high relative to others countries, at 14, 8 and just over 4 respectively. While spending the biggest expense on healthcare, the proportion of hospital beds per thousand of American was the least, at less than over 10 comparing to Japan. Additionally, there was a narrow discrepancy in four remaining countries, which was almost under 4.
- The pie charts below show the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and 2007 73
- Woman and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender 22
- The table below gives information about cars made in Argentina, Australia and Thailand from 2003 to 2009 10
- The bar chart and table below give information about heathcare resources and average life expectancy in different countries. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e for Japan, Germany and Netherlands was considerably high relative to others cou...
^^
Line 7, column 424, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'comparing' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'compares'.
Suggestion: compares
...can was the least, at less than over 10 comparing to Japan. Additionally, there was a nar...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44571428571 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04171809667 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.691428571429 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.8553361845 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 119.125 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127653052484 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581925468231 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638401793789 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910902567409 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755487665594 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.