The supplied pie chart depicts four ways of energy production in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. We can immediately see, that number of units have been almost same in both countries, however, there were no nuclear energy production in New Zealand.
In 1980, energy product from coal had significant proportion in both countries, when in New Zealand more than half (56 units). Natural gas for energy production have been used almost same in Germany as New Zealand, 28 and 30 per units respectively. When Hydro energy production was sharing same percentage with Natural Gas in New Zealand (30 units), petroleum and nuclear production have been the third most used source in Germany, 22 and 20 units respectively.
Getting back to the details, in 2010, coal production tripled in New Zealand (150 units), when in Germany, energy product in Nuclear power plant was 8 times more than in 1980 (155 units). Energy production from hydro sources was represented in 46 cases in New Zealand, when in Germany only 2 units. Natural gas have been used in both countries in only 2 units.
To sum up, each country showed big changes in energy production and focused on production in roughly three quoters to one main source for its production.
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. 61
- More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poo 56
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where rel 61
- Traffic congestion is becoming a huge problem for many major cities. Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce traffic big cities. 56
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, third, as for, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87142857143 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57257910769 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509523809524 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8144047482 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.666666667 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227932306508 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127314494016 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104335625649 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158035299572 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708040722014 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.