Some countries achieve international sports by building specialized facilities to train top athletes, instead of providing sport facilities that every can use. Do you think this is positive or negative development?
These days, some nations would rather reach global sports by constructing specialized infrastructure to train top athletes than subsidize facilities which everyone could use for sport. In my opinion, it is drawbacks.
On a hand, the government could spend an amount of money on building specialized equipments. It means that to have sport centres which educate talent people to become gifted athletes would waste a lot of money and time. There are two main reasons to explain for it. Initially, looking for talent young people could spend much time and money. In addition, there are a lot of means which are used for sport have to be updated and cared for frequently. For example, some countries could expend 10 million dollars on training young sport people while others only spend 1 million dollars on providing sport facilities which their every citizen could use every day. It causes that the government would have to waste a lot of money on sports, instead of develop other majors. Therefore, building specialized sport centers to train talent people is not the best way to achieve many records in the world.
On other hand, top athletes would have the best education and grow their talent. In other words, there are not many people who are interested in playing sport every day. It is because a big part of people are officers who are too busy to train frequently sports. For instance, there are many people who prefer spending their free time on staying family and friends to training sports. Thus, it seems to be essential for the government to subsidize specialized and expensive equipments for everyone.
In conclusion, some countries want to reach global sports by building many specialized facilities to train gifted people, instead of subsidizing them for citizens. In my point, this way has some its negative aspects and is not really the best way for this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-02 | Thien Trang | 67 | view |
| 2018-07-02 | Thien Trang | 56 | view |
- Some people think that young people should go to university to further their education while others think that they should be encouraged to work as car mechanic or builder, etc to serve society. Discuss both opinion and give your own opinion. 73
- Some countries achieve international sports by building specialized facilities to train top athletes, instead of providing sport facilities that every can use. Do you think this is positive or negative development? 56
- Children’s education is expensive. In some countries, the government pay some or all of the costs. Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages? 61
- Some people believe the government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Many young people who leave school hold a negative attitude towards learning. Why does this happen? What are the solutions? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...not really the best way for this issue.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, really, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97777777778 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54251825814 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47619047619 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7906311574 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2352941176 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5294117647 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64705882353 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280323197928 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088925130823 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899866390237 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200094075574 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730827503612 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.