tpo23
Both the reading passage and the lecture talking about the declining in the yellow cedar tree, a species of tree common in northwestern North America. The article avers the hypotheses of declining, while the professor opposes these hypotheses by saying we still do not know what killing the tree and none of these explanations are convincing. And he argues each one of these as follows.
First, the passage states that declining of the yellow cedar tree may occur because of beetle, type of parasites insect. However, the speaker claims that by pointing the healthy cedar park, who is the beetle attacked, contain a chemical component that should kill the beetle. And this insect eats just the dead one. So the damage caused by the battle is not fundamental.
Second, the article discusses the brown bears are one of the causes of the declining because they are feeding on the tree park. Although the professor counters this point by telling the bears are not responsible for this declining because the declining occurs on another island with no bears, so this hypothesis is also rejected.
Third, the passage points out the gradual change of the weather as one of the explanations of declining because the root damaged from freezing. On the other hand, the professor casts doubt on this point by explaining that dying is happening not only in the high elevation also in the low altitude. If the death occurs by the low-temperature island so why the declining is more in the high heat elevations? By that, the professor also contradicts this explanation.
Comments
More positive sentences
More positive sentences wanted, what that means?
here goes the answer:
here goes the answer:
https://www.testbig.com/forum/sentences-positivenegativeneutral-sentime…
it is not a serious issue.
Essay evaluation report
Both the reading passage and the lecture talking about the declining in the yellow cedar tree
Both the reading passage and the lecture are talking about the declining in the yellow cedar tree
First, the passage states that declining of the yellow cedar tree may occur because of beetle, type of parasites
First, the passage states that the declining of the yellow cedar tree may occur because of beetle, type of parasites
article discusses the brown bears are one of the causes of the declining
article discusses the brown bears, which are one of the causes of the declining
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 24 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 12
No. of Words: 262 250
No. of Characters: 1265 1200
No. of Different Words: 137 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.023 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.828 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.557 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 90 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 66 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 39 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 31 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.154 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.384 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.846 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.347 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.568 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.092 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 387, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies of tree common in northwestern North First, the passage states that declining...
^^^
Line 5, column 462, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssor also contradicts this explanation.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, third, while, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01060070671 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7024572349 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494699646643 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 431.1 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5102864681 49.2860985944 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.076923077 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342970789122 0.272083759551 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111461371849 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808711279766 0.0662205650399 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200807120702 0.162205337803 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470794475908 0.0443174109184 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.