The supplied graph depicts wages change over one decade from 1993 to 2003 in one unspecified country. As its obvious from data given, over ten years there have been dramatical rase and downs.
Overall, despite changes over ten years percentage growth in wage have been same in 1993 as in 2003, 2 per cent. There were growing trend in 1994 from two to almost 4 per cent, with followed downward trend in next year. After two years of very slight changes, significant raise to its peak of 6 per cent in 1998. However, this in followed year, there were sharp decrease in percentage growth in wages of 3 per cent to 3 per cent. This downward trend continued till 2002 to its low of 1 per cent grow in wages.
To sum up, wages in unnamed country have changed over the decade, when experienced fluctuation trend with same percentage of wage growth at beginning as the end of decade.
- International travel is cheaper and more convenient than ever. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- The pie charts compare the percentage of carbohydrates, protein and fat with three different diet programs. 56
- Traffic congestion is becoming a huge problem for many major cities. Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce traffic big cities. 73
- The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010. 67
- Full time university student spend most of their time in academic subjects. Some people say that they should engage in other activities also . Do you agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 719.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52201257862 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31721534746 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572327044025 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.3616672462 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.875 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161964074684 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804164993843 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452545374147 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121794561563 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302782442889 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.