The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.

The supplied table enumerates statistic informations of metro system in London, Paris, Tokyo, Washington DC, Kyoto and Los Angeles. It is obviously seen that London has longest operational underground trains as well as longest network, however, metro in Tokyo transport significantly more passengers than any other underground train system from named countries.

Londoners using their train underground system the longest time (1863), but, in Los Angeles metro system was established 138 years later (2001). Two European countries, London and Paris, dominate in length of their subway network, 394 kilometres and 199 kilometres respectively. In contrast to Kyoto, where metro system operates only 11 kilometres of rail.

Getting back to the data, Tokyo's metro transports the most passengers than any other subway system, followed by metro in Paris 1927 and 1191 millions a year respectively.
Nevertheless its long history and excessive length of its network, subway in London transport 775 commuters per year. The lowest number of transported passengers showing the shortest underground train system in Kyoto (45 millions a year).

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'has the longest'.
Suggestion: has the longest
...geles. It is obviously seen that London has longest operational underground trains as well ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...and 1191 millions a year respectively. Nevertheless its long history and excessive length o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, well, in contrast, as well as, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66470588235 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87032906255 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629411764706 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7281005439 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.375 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 5.23603664747 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132392555477 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667823736873 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495255184916 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0833431677994 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437611795877 0.0819641961636 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.