Some people believe that to protect local culture, tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
For the last few decades, many nations have witnessed the overwhelming inflow of tourists. Like any advancement, this has also brought some negative effects to culture along with its economic benefits. Some think that banning strangers in certain parts would be a desirable solution, and others find it as a worthless method to retain traditions. Although, I am in favour of the later group, however, this essay will discuss both the viewpoints.
To begin with, the economic growth of any developing nations depends on the tourism industry to great extent. So, banning visitors would result in an economic down-flow. Moreover, many people employment demands on the outlets like restaurants, hotels and shops opened to cater the growing demand of tourist, thus, prohibiting visitors in some areas could affect their earnings, which is a necessity for the majority of people.
considering the viewpoint of former group people, local people tend to copy the cultural values of the outsiders for making them comfortable, and in-turn develop these as habbits. Resulting in the vanishing of the local traditions, however, blaming the tourist for this, would not be completely justified. Youth is following the media a lot, so they are one who are influencing this young generations. Today, children like to follow the new trend as highlighted in televisions and internet. In addition to this, they can learn different values from the social groups which are no longer limited to physical boundaries.
After analysing above, it can be concluded that tourism is solely not responsible for the change in local customs, therefore, banning it would certainly not helpful, rather it could affect the growth of any area, which depends on the foreign visitors for the financial support.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-06 | vikrampreet SINGH | 78 | view |
| 2020-03-15 | Emjay | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | shaily | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-04 | Tolik | 84 | view |
| 2018-10-02 | nazirsumara | 84 | view |
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home withother old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimesthe government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family? 84
- Some people think that employers should ensure a supportive and pleasant work environment where each employee is respected and valued equally while others think employers should focus instead on providing better facilities and equipment 63
- Modern technology is now very common in most work places. How do you think this has changed the way we work? Do you think there are disadvantages to relying too much ontechnology? 67
- New household appliances have resulted in more free time for women and have enabled them to both work and run a home with dependent children What are the advantages for a family when the mother works Do you think the disadvantages outweigh the advantages 77
- Having more money and less free time is better than earning lessmoney and having more free time. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Considering
...ecessity for the majority of people. considering the viewpoint of former group people, l...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3038869258 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74453004261 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628975265018 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7974107181 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.461538462 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19987606524 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602153011386 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485135823591 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119739499948 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514036754092 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.