Nowadays, some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works by using computer. Do you agree or disagree?
With the advent of the computer, it remains a controversy that whether conventional museums and art galleries should maintained or discontinued since people can search for historical relics online. In my opinion, while high technology offers great benefits, traditional museums and galleries have their own merits and should be kept intact.
To begin with, computers give people a new convenient method to study historical objects and famous art. With a few clicks, individuals’ can have access to a massive amount of information about any type of relics without having to go somewhere else to search for. For instance, typing ‘Vietnamese traditional drum’ in Google search and simply hitting the ‘Enter’ button will result in a list of information about this drum’s origin, other fascinating features, and images. Same actions could be done to search artistic works such as paintings and sculptures thanks to the global access of the computers. To sum up, using technology would be definitely more convenient when people want to learn about historical items and works.
However, public museums and art galleries should not be underestimated in this technology era. Firstly, there are a majority of people who are really enthusiastic and interested in relics and art. These individuals usually prefer going to the museums and galleries to feast their eyes and admire the actual items to just viewing pictures on the internet. Secondly, since the antiques and artistic works must not be destroyed and should be stored somewhere, art galleries and museums act as storages and showcases at the same time for economic purpose. As a result, these locations not only help to preserve precious legacies but also gain profit which could be used in other activities such as charity.
In conclusion, despite the privileges that computers offer are enormous, public museums and art galleries still have an important role in preserving historical objects and works. Thus, these places should be allowed to continue their business.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-06 | cccchloe | 61 | view |
| 2018-07-05 | drtruong92 | 84 | view |
- Some people think that higher education should free for everyone Some others however think that it should not be free Discuss both views and give your opinions 81
- You have recently moved to a different house. Write a letter to a friend. In your letter1) explain why you have moved.2) describe the new house.3) Invite your friend to come and visit. 73
- Once children start school the teachers have more influence on their intellectual and social development than parents To what extend do you agree or disagree 70
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with? Discuss both the views and give your view. 73
- You are applying for a job and need a letter of reference.Write a letter to a former teacher. In your letter:give details of the jobexplain why it is important to yousuggest what information your teacher could put in the reference 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'majorities'?
Suggestion: majorities
...is technology era. Firstly, there are a majority of people who are really enthusiastic a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, really, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43125 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.963521712 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8232355925 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.142857143 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5714285714 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272584266532 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988718893358 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621422879759 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171647726358 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033306816485 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.