Failures are the pillars of success. Everybody makes mistakes; everybody fails; but the most important thing is our reaction to failure. We can learn a lot from our mistakes; rectify those mistakes and come out better next time. But it is seen that many people do not learn from mistakes; instead they are afraid of failing. Some people give up even before trying their best thinking that there are high chances of failure in the work. Similar is the case with students. Some students, being afraid of failure, stop studying a particular subject with a past record of high rate of failure of students. Hence, I think, students should not be threatened with possible failure for better learning.
Again, there are students who think much regarding the consequences of failure. They are worried about the criticism they have to face after failure. They think that his friends will think him to be a dull and insipid person. So, if these students are intimidated with possible failure, they will spend much time thinking about handling the situation after failure instead of studying hard and trying their level best to overcome failure.
I have seen many of my friends not taking science even after being eligible and having a strong desire to learn science. The only reason they did not take admission in science courses was that they were cowed by their parents and primary school teachers regarding high rate of drop outs from science courses. Thus they could not learn science only because they were frightened with possible failure in taking the subject.
Hence, from the preceding discussion full of explanations and examples, it is clear that the author’s statement stating that the students learn better when they are not threatened by failure is logical and true.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement.Students learn better when they are not threatened with possible failure.Use reasons and specific examples to support your opinion. 70
- The belief that animals can sense an earthquake before it occurs has been held since ancient times. Countries such as China and Japan, which suffer frequently from the devastation brought about by seismic disturbances, have a long history of attempting to 80
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...rate of drop outs from science courses. Thus they could not learn science only becau...
^^^^
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...atement stating that the students learn better when they are not threatened by failure...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, regarding, so, thus, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 296.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03716216216 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39295813386 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527027027027 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5728289495 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1875 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.45110844103 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229519967021 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790457231689 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569531752207 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14163122115 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162881781223 0.0645574589148 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.