The bar graph illustrates the count of japanese tourist's travelling oversea's from 1985 to 1995 and the line graph depicts the propotion of japanese tourists, who visited the australia during the same period.
Overall, the maximum japanese visiters travelled to australia in the year 1993 and minimum visiter travelled in the year 1985.
After a carefull analysis, the numbers of japanese tourist, who travelled to abroad in 1985 were 5 million and it increased slightly and reached to 11 million in 1990. After that, it drop down to 10 million in 1991 and then again reached to 12 million in 1993. In next step, it increased sharply to 15 million in 1995 and continously incresed upto 1998.
Probing ahead, the australia share of japanese tourist market in 1985 was 2 percent and it was increased slightly to near about 5 percent in 1988 then it declined to 4 percent in 1989. After that, it increased sharply to peak point 6 percent in 1993 and then it was declined to 6 percent 1994.
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons 85
- A large number of deaths are caused by road accidents.Why do so many road accidents accour? Make recommendations that would help to reduce the number of road accidents. 52
- Young people these days tend to be less polite and respectful than in the past. Causes and solutions. 73
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'drops'?
Suggestion: drops
...d to 11 million in 1990. After that, it drop down to 10 million in 1991 and then aga...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 823.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78488372093 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53927372156 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0609439975 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.571428571 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.571428571429 5.23603664747 11% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225858149681 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104050530395 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848845351111 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141242819084 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421979255696 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.