Some companies spend a lot of money on scientific research and use animals for testing. Many argue that this is for a just cause while others say otherwise. Do the advantages of using animals in research outweigh its disadvantages?
Support your answer with specific reasons and examples
Over the past decades, there is a contentious issues about the animal cruelty behind the manufacturing process of major consumer goods. While some commentators abominate the employment of animal-testing, it remains evident to the fact that the necessity might outweigh the culpability it ensues. The aim of this essay is set to review both viewpoints.
To begin with, the purpose of testing procedures applying on animals is often perceived as an impetus on assuring the quality of ultimate products. What this means is having a real application of experimental chemicals entailing medicines and perfume, scientists are capable to draw conclusion in accordance with the measurements, which in turn guarantee the safeness of the products prior to making contact with human skins upon public launch. Recent empirical research from the Pokemon Company ascertain that over 700 failed assessments on monkeys pave the way for their successful implementation of super soldier serum. Seen in this light, animal testing is likely to be an imperative to inventions, especially those derived from chemistry.
Although there is a case necessitating animal test, the impact of conducting such operation cannot be underestimated. In fact, the spate of confrontation against the ensuing products from customers has perplexed the public relationship sector of some laboratories. Extensive studies from the P&G company indicates that the demand of particular products, coupled with the break of animal test involvement, has witnessed a considerable decline of 50% from last year. Admittedly, the market share of products being tested by animals are encountering challenges from their animal-friendly counterparts, the integration of such evaluation, therefore, accompanies by a high tendency on hindering market expansion.
In conclusion, conducting animal tests has coincidently begot benefits on quality assurance and the possible hindrance on marketing, yet the gravity of reinforcing safety, however, by far outweigh the moral disagreement. It is predicted that factories will intensify the effort spent on precluding the evidence of animal test from being exposed to public.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-10 | Sanaullah97 | 82 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | Mike_Moody | 62 | view |
| 2018-07-11 | RockyGagKy | 86 | view |
- The presence of technology in the classroom has become more and more apparent and offers students tremendous resources with which to supplement their education. Given time, technology will completely replace the traditional teacher in the classroom.Do you 89
- The chart below shows the number of men and women (in thousand) in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. 78
- Describe a custom from your country that you would like people from other countries to adopt.Explain your choice, using specific reasons and examples. 84
- Some people think that schools have to be more entertaining, while others think that their sole purpose is to educate.Which do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 11
- Space exploration requires vast sums of money. Is the amount of money spent on space research justifiable? Could the money be better spent?What is your viewpoint on this issue? Give reasons for your answer. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'issue'?
Suggestion: issue
...he past decades, there is a contentious issues about the animal cruelty behind the man...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1849.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72445820433 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22980410253 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637770897833 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.75957748 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.230769231 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8461538462 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16069686656 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565544060107 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0318602422273 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0968036457911 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223870140934 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.89 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.