Some companies spend a lot of money on scientific research and use animals for testing Many argue that this is for a just cause while others say otherwise Do the advantages of using animals in research outweigh its disadvantages

In the recent era, the people's outlook has changed much, and they become research-minded, so they spend a lot of money on research, especially in the medical sector. Before the practicality of a material in the real world scientists apply this to an animal to see its effectiveness. Some people take it positively, while others give their opinion against it. From my side, I can say that its usefulness is more rather than negative.

On the one hand, when a bio-chemist makes a new medicine to cure a fatal disease, it is very risky to apply this directly to a man or a woman, while the side effects are unknown. Therefore, animals are the best choice for scientists. For example, in contemporary times, people all around the world have to face a pandemic situation and scientists also invent curable vaccines, whereas these vaccines may have many side effects on the human body, and sometimes it might be responsible for the death. Consequently, before they push it into the human body they apply it to animals, so that, they can know the reaction and makes it more efficient. In addition, in space research animal is used to find out that the new planet in the galaxy is suitable for human to live or not.

On the other hand, the excess use of animals in research may cause an ecological imbalance, as a result, species may be extinct from the earth in the future. This will bring threat to the human to live on the earth. The ancient animals and those animals which number is so low shouldn't use in those research where there is a chance of life-threatening, therefore these animals will be abolished from the world. For instance, different species of chimpanzees are used for research but those should not be used which is on the verge of extinction.

In conclusion, to sum up, all the points above, it is clear that, though it has both pros and cons, its drawbacks can not cross the area of benefits.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
In the recent era, the peoples outlook has changed much, and they beco...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Before” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...arch, especially in the medical sector. Before the practicality of a material in the r...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...nd those animals which number is so low shouldnt use in those research where there is a ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, look, may, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66568047337 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69712326989 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547337278107 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1369044463 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.642857143 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9285714286 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344969608843 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11293819595 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707229100815 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180499665241 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10201210689 0.056905535591 179% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.