The chart illustrates the amount of money spent on 5 consumer goods (cars, computers, books, perfume and cameras) in France and the UK in 2010. Units are measured in pounds sterling.
Overall, the expenditure of the UK was higher than that of France. Both the French and the British spent the most money on cars while in the UK the least amount of the money was spent on perfume compared to cameras in France.
In terms of cars, the UK spent around 450000 pounds in this as opposed to exactly 400000 pounds in France. The expenditure on books in the UK was higher than in France (about 400000 and 300000 pounds respectively).
On the other hand, the amount of money paid out on the remaining good was higher in France. Above 350000 pounds was spent by the French on computers was slightly more than the British who spent exactly 350000 pounds. Neither of the countries spent much on perfume which accounted fro 200000 pounds of expenditure in France but under 150000 pounds in the UK.
- Many young people change their jobs and careers. What are the reasons for this? Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The graph shows oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010. 78
- The best way to resolve the international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. 67
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: FOR_FRO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for'?
Suggestion: for
...s spent much on perfume which accounted fro 200000 pounds of expenditure in France ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 819.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31563276494 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451428571429 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2613966759 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102919278253 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052354046118 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647931018018 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.078577546458 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637196862384 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.56 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.