The given line graph well illustrates how often were three various types of crime (burglary, car thieft and robbery) in Newport happened, in number of incidents, from 2003 to 2012. It can be clearly seen that there are two main trends in this graph: downward and unstable.
In details, the amount of incidents in burglary had a good starting point, with 3400 in the year of 2003, respectively, and then rose to 3700 one year later, before falling down dramatically to 1100 in the year of 2008. It then had a slight growth to nearly 1500 in 2009 and remained unchanged until the end of the period.
Meanwhile, car theft occurred 2700 incidents in the first two years, and then had a sharp decrease to almost 2000 in 2006. In the next five years, it went up slowly and broke the 2500 milestone in 2010. It ended the period in the year of 2012 by hitting its starting point. Lastly, the probability in robbery contributed a small part of the graph. It was fluctuated between the range of 500 and 1000 in the whole period.
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003-2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003-2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The chart shows the percentage of drugs taken by girls and boys in a school in New Zealand. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The bar chart below shows the employment of all male and female workers by occupation in the UK, in the year 2005. 11
- The proliferation of private cars on the roads in many parts of the world has led to serious problems of pollution and may contribute to global warming Some people think that governments should spend money for the development of public transportation syst 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, lastly, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51891891892 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40743916453 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637837837838 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9105372481 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8888888889 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0631556698887 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0218369404086 0.103423049105 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348723665557 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0452075176256 0.15604864568 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442507728244 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.