The above-mentioned pie-chart represents the most determined causes of degradation of agricultural land throughout the world and the possible,three regions impacted by it ,in the whole period of 1990's.I will explained the given whole data on the upcoming paragraphs.
Firstly, over-grazing and deforestation were the main concernable causes that had 35% and 30% share in total percentage of the whole causes. Beside it, over-cultivation was 28% and other causes left with 7% participation in it.
Secondly, europe faced total 23% degraded land over oceania and north-america that had 13% and 5% degraded land area. In oceania, over-grazing had 11.3% share in total degraded land proportion and europe and north-america share 9.8% of deforestation and 3.3% of over-cultivation in the whole degraded area.
In the conclusion, it seems to me that over-grazing played an important role in land degradation and it impacted badly to ocenia, while, europe had a large degraded area on over other regions.
- Task 2: Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment?Give reasons for your answ 96
- the graph below shows the number of enquiries received by Tourist Information Office in one city a six-month period in 2011 56
- Some people think that to spend or enjoy money once they earn it but others think that to save the money and to enjoy it in the future What stand do you agree with and Why Give the specific reasons and examples which support your opinion 88
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how there causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 56
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where releva 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , three
...nd throughout the world and the possible,three regions impacted by it ,in the whole pe...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he possible,three regions impacted by it ,in the whole period of 1990s.I will expl...
^^
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...ted by it ,in the whole period of 1990s.I will explained the given whole data on ...
^
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'explain'
Suggestion: explain
...it ,in the whole period of 1990s.I will explained the given whole data on the upcoming pa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rcentage of the whole causes. Beside it, over-cultivation was 28% and other cause...
^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ver-cultivation was 28% and other causes left with 7% participation in it. Se...
^^
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ced total 23% degraded land over oceania and north-america that had 13% and 5% de...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52258064516 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41509168203 2.65546596893 129% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561290322581 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0536150659 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.666666667 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0939123263713 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531629606823 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459869255295 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0653058860894 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504071212674 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.