The article states that improving trees by genetic modification are very effective and useful and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that there are serious problems with genetically modified trees and refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading claims that these trees are more resistant than natural trees. The professor refutes this point by saying that these trees are not resistant when they expose some situations like climate change and they will die. because they don’t design for this situation. But wild trees are naturally resistant to these situations and they get survived.
Second, the article posits that genetically modified trees are more economical than natural trees. Because they grow fast and yields a greater number of fruits. However, the professor says that genetic modification is costly. According to the professor, farmers need to expend a huge money for buy seeds these trees and after each season they need to cost again for buying these seeds because they are forbidden by law to collect seeds from available trees.
Third, the reading says that using modified trees will survive natural tree because they grow fast and satisfy the need for wood. The professor opposes this point by explaining that modified trees compete by natural trees for sunrise and nutrient in the soil. Because, their growth is faster and a number of them are more, they cause damage to natural trees.
- TPO-20 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama 80
- TPO-27 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and ex 60
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin 75
- TPO-23 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons an 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 232, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
... like climate change and they will die. because they don't design for this situati...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'huge money'.
Suggestion: huge money
...o the professor, farmers need to expend a huge money for buy seeds these trees and after eac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1232.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26495726496 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36022820635 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508547008547 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 371.7 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.7906074629 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7692307692 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23076923077 7.06452816374 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425806102619 0.272083759551 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178118077005 0.0996497079465 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791050193711 0.0662205650399 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281383974913 0.162205337803 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643307017709 0.0443174109184 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.