The bar chart below show the marriage and divorce statistics for nine countries in 1981 and 1984
The given layouts depict the information about the marriage and divorce rate by eight nations during the years 1981and 1984. Collaboration of data is done in per thousand people, and which is clearly and coherently represented.
Overall, what stands out from the graphs that the divorce statistic experienced fluctuations in both years, while the rate of marriage were inclined in all countries in the given time period.
At first glance it is clear that the major influence of marriage and divorce rate in USA which was above 1,000 and 8,000 in two years respectively.
Germany had a similar profile in the rate of divorce at 2,000. Moreover, Italy was the only country in which less people got divorce below one thousand in 1981 and 1994.
It could be noticed that, there were a slight difference of 1000 in the rate
of marriage in three nations: Germany, France and Italy. The marriage statistics of not also Denmark but also USA had been outracted the remaining six countires. Japan around 6,500 in 1981 but it fell down at 6,200 in the marriage statistic.
- The graphs below show the weekly earnings of men and women in Euros for the 16-59 age groups as per their education level. 78
- Percentage of food budget spent on restaurant meals and homemade food in years 1970 1980 1990 and 2000. 67
- The diagrams show the stages amd equipment used in the process of cement making and how cement is used to produce the concrete for building purposes. 78
- Polygamy has lead to massive divorce rate around the globe. Give possible solution and discuss the reasons behind the issue? 73
- The bar chart below show the marriage and divorce statistics for nine countries in 1981 and 1984 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 109, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...er, Italy was the only country in which less people got divorce below one thousand i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97237569061 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56447639445 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60773480663 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0496913567 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233291184888 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891466284032 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523907882003 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104161482529 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570875858636 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.