Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.
Recently, the phenomenon of placing advertisements in public school for funding and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of advertising in school is highly beneficial for students, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the effectiveness of advertisements can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, placing advertisements in public school can provide the educational manager with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of using money on extra curriculum for students and providing scholarship to the bright pupils, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a school student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of advertisements in social and professional life. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both helping students with more advance curriculum and awareness about surroundings through advertisements apparently can be seen.
From a realm of educational science, placing advertisements in school might increase the consequences of damaging the beauty of premises. Moreover, fundamental aspects of advertisements could relate to this reality that the demerits of false and mislead advertisements pertain to student’s brain development. As a tangible example, some academic research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the advertisements is correlated negatively with risk of exploiting students as a captive audience. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the placing advertisements far outweigh its drawback. However, school’s manager and principle should be prudent enough to have fruitful outcomes of placing advertisements on their premises.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | Prabu | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | Keiwan | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-27 | topraveesh | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-17 | ajayaryanone | 88 | view |
| 2019-03-12 | ahmedmemon_93 | 77 | view |
- People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new roads for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computers. They are used in businesses, hospitals, crime detection and even to fly planes. What things will they be used for in the future? Is this dependence on computers a good thing or should we be more suspici 88
- Student travel to study is overrated, we have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really required for higher studies? 85
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 88
- University only requires applying digital media rather than continuously upgrading textbook Agree or disagree 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 1207.87684729 145% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89597315436 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.52374719419 2.71678728327 130% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587248322148 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 379.143842365 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9271674933 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.416666667 104.977214359 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.25397266985 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220039660238 0.242375264174 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081061927227 0.0925447433944 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565140848813 0.071462118173 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135754232564 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320848284251 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 12.6369458128 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.24 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.